2011/4/8 Dean Willis <dean.wil...@softarmor.com>: > I think you're right that the spec is written incorrectly. I believe it > should describe that the multiplier on T1 doubles with each reset. This is > not clear in the existing text. So for example, if 8*T1 < T2, then the third > reset is 8*T1, and if 16*T1 < T2, then the 4th reset is 16*T2 > > Otherwise said, MIN(2^N*T1,T2) where N is the repetition iterator.
That would clarify it, right. >> PS: Sorry for the cross-posting, I don't know which maillist is better >> to report it. > > sipc...@ietf.org would probably be the right place. Finally I've reported an errata for RFC 3261 (hope it's also a good place): http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3261 Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business. Use sip-implement...@cs.columbia.edu for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation. Use dispa...@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip. Use sipc...@ietf.org for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.
