I think a substitution is a better way of describing the feature but unless you change the documentation then -key is fine.
Peter Peter Higginson Newport Networks Ltd, Direct line 01494 470694 http://www.newport-networks.com/ -----Original Message----- From: Olivier Jacques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 November 2006 14:55 To: Peter Higginson Cc: 'Charles P Wright'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Generic Command Line Processing Peter Higginson wrote: > I would basically agree about too much flexibility. > > Rather than -set which is not that obvious, how about -subs foo=bar > > My logic is that I always end up explaining the [foo] as substitutions, > rather than other parameters which are options or things used by the code. > Good point. What about "-key foo=bar", all [xxx] are referred as "keywords" in the documentation. -- Olivier HP OpenCall Software http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/ --------------- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the contents in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
