Eyal Czitron wrote:
> Oliver/Charles,
> After checking a bit more I found out that you where right :). The
> problem doesn't lie there as it lies in the hash function. All our
> transactions pretty much look the same the only difference is the to-tag
> + the sip-etag header.
> Iv'e changed the hash function to a better one (sdbm, also used by
> Berkley-db) causing better distribution of the keys and fewer splits and
> the problem was solved :)
> I also fixed the makefile + sipp.hpp to make everything compile under
> solaris.
> Attached are the diff files.
> Please reply telling me that you guys accept/or not my fixes.
> Regards,
> Amit On
>   

Let's try this new hash function. It looks like it should not impact 
performances compared to the old one.
Checked-in, SVN 118.

Thank you,

-- 
Olivier
HP OpenCall Software
http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to