Juan,

Scenario description:

I register 10 number on location A each with a different port. > 128X0
and 10 numbers on location B each with a different port. > 129X0
(The X relates to the extension number e.g. 687-2800, 687-2810 ...

Both location are separate instance of an IMS platform.
and the numbers are registered via an ACME Packet.
So we have several B2BUA is the scenario.

Location A:
Client ---> ACME Packet (B2BUA)
            ACME Packet ---> A(P-CSCF/S-CSCF) -- > Application Server A (B2BUA)

Interconnect:
              Application Server A --> A(P-CSCF/S-CSCF)---> /
                        --->     B(P-CSCF/S-CSCF)  --->  Application Server B

Location B:
            ACME Packet ---> P-CSCF / S-CSCF -- > Application Server (B2BUA)
Client ---> ACME Packet (B2BUA)

First I register all the numbers  which gives me an 30 minutes window for calls.
By the way the registrations are ok (no issue here)

Now I start on  B client side 10 servers.
BTW: The b client is a SuSE 10.1 Linux PC and each instance is started in 
a separate window.
 
sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12800 -mp 22800 -sn uas -nd
sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12810 -mp 22810 -sn uas -nd
sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12820 -mp 22820 -sn uas -nd
sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12830 -mp 22830 -sn uas -nd
-
-
sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12890 -mp 22890 -sn uas -nd

What I want to establish are complete calls between.

A1 --> B1
A2 --> B2
-
-
A10 --> B10

On a one to one bases ( not fancy yet)

A1 --> INVITE --> B1
   <-- Trying
   <--- 180
   <--- 200 OK
   -->  ACK
        pause 2 sec.
   -->  BUY
   <--  200OK
        pause 1 sec.

The first on A1 / B1 goes ok.
The next instance A2 / B2 is failing. I see the calls coming (wireshark) but 
the server (second) does not receive the call.

So maybe this makes it a little more clear what I am trying to do.

Regards,
Peter Bakkenes


-----Original Message-----
From: Juan Antonio Alvarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 5:55 AM
To: Bakkenes, Peter (Peter)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Multiple instances of the uas and uac.


On 12/11/06, Bakkenes, Peter (Peter) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a small problem:
>
> I have 2x 10 numbers available which I have registered with different
> local_ports but from the 2 different ip addresses.
>
> 10 as client on one ip address with different local_ports/media_ports and
> 10 as server on one ip address and also different local_ports/media_ports.
>
> Now I want to start a server on ten of these ports.
> example:
>
> sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12800 -mp 22800 -sn uas -nd
>
> sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12810 -mp 22810 -sn uas -nd
>
> sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12820 -mp 22820 -sn uas -nd
>
> sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12830 -mp 22830 -sn uas -nd
> -
> -
>
> sipp 172.16.111.220 -p 12890 -mp 22890 -sn uas -nd
>
> similar I use it for clients so that I can generate traffic
> to the servers. However, the servers are starting fine but
> only the first is receiving calls. Could this due to the fact
> that they are started with the same ip?
> The servers are started from a Linux (SuSE 10.1) based machine.
>
> An idea if this should work or a way to make it work.
>
> I am still a little novice with SIPp so any help is appreciated.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter Bakkenes
>
>

What about the scenario? What port are you sending you requests to in
the clients? What service are you requesting? is there a sip proxy or
other kind of sip server in the middle? Does it know hoy to route the
calls? How are you registering the UAs?

I hope the answers to those questions is the answer to yours.

Good luck,

Juan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to