Olivier, I only changed to the get_double, didn't receive/find a better name for the internal variable. You can find the diff in attach (if you put it in the main code, I can start new things on the newest version:-).
It runs here for weeks now and probabilities seem OK. About my previous point 4: I'm still having large questions about the receive handling code around lines 2950-2990 in call.cpp, where I couldn't get any clue on what exactly the goal/usage of that code part (all the tests on optional or not, variable set or not). Anybody being able to put some little comment or documentation on that would be great. Best regards, MarcVD -----Original Message----- From: Olivier Jacques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 December 2006 16:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] statistical (conditional) branching Marc, let us know when you have a new diff, so that I can have a look at the new version too. Olivier. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: **** DISCLAIMER **** http://www.belgacom.be/maildisclaimer
sipp.2006-11-08_chance.diff
Description: sipp.2006-11-08_chance.diff
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
