Patches item #1669448, was opened at 2007-02-26 20:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=637566&aid=1669448&group_id=104305
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: sipp Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: monica (monica_sarbu) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: uri parameter in [authentication] Initial Comment: Hi, I would like to propose this small patch that allows defining custom authentication URI as a parameter per message. Something like: [authentication [EMAIL PROTECTED] password=pass uri=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is useful when there are both REGISTER and INVITE in the same scenario and both must be authenticated. -auth_uri command line option is not enough in this case. In my patch, the -auth_uri has higher priority than the uri defined in the [authentication]. That's only for keeping the changes to minimum. I've noticed that this was requested before on the emailing list. Also, the 'sip:' scheme should not be hardcoded if the authentication URI is provided by user. Monica Sarbu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=637566&aid=1669448&group_id=104305 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
