Hi Franz,
sounds great. I even think this was suggested already - but never got coded
or integrated, I don't recall.
Do you plan on implementing it or do expect someone to?
Olivier.
On 3/7/07, Franz Edler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I propose the following feature:
As an alternative to using multiple response statements (and always
including a new response code on occasion) like:
<recv response="403" optional="true" next="1">
</recv>
<recv response="404" optional="true" next="1">
</recv>
<recv response="408" optional="true" next="1">
</recv>
I would prefer a wildcard notation like:
<recv response="4??" optional="true" next="1">
</recv>
Any comments?
Cheers
Franz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
--
HP OpenCall Software
http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
