Hi Charles
you are correct, there is a label at the end to jump to in case of a "200 OK
scenario"
This is how it looks like today (pseudo code):
<recv request="INVITE" crlf="true" next="1" chance="0.01">
<!-- Send 100 Trying -->
<pause distribution="uniform" min="600" max="900" />
<!-- Send 183 Ringing -->
<pause distribution="uniform" min="200" max="400" />
<!-- Send 200 OK (Answer call) -->
<recv request="ACK" optional="true" crlf="true">
<recv request="BYE">
<!-- Send 200 OK -->
<pause milliseconds="4000" next="2"/>
<label id="1"/>
<!-- Send 100 Trying -->
<!-- Send 500 error -->
<label id="2"/>
Should it be enough to set chance="0.01" in the beginning?
Regards,
// Andreas
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles P Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:30 PM
To: Andreas Byström
Cc: [email protected];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Question on random branching
Andreas,
Do you have a label at the end of your scenario that you jump to after your
standard call setup? Something like:
<recv request="INVITE" crlf="true" next="1" chance="0.01">
</recv>
<send 100 />
<send 180 />
<send 200 next="2" />
<label id="1" />
<send 500 />
<label id="2" />
Assuming this isn't it if you post your full scenario, then you should be
able to get better answers.
Charles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/08/2007 04:47:32 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been browsing through the mail archive but cant find any
> answer to the problem I have. I hope that someone can help me
>
> I'm writing a AUS scenario and it starts with receiving an Invite.
> Then I want that in 99% of the cases the call should be setup with
> 180, 200 and so on. However, for 1% of the calls I want to send 500
> Server Error instead (to simulate a specific case). When reading the
> manual I found the "chance" command and tried to using that. This is
> how my script starts:
> <recv request="INVITE" crlf="true" next="1" chance="0.01">
> </recv>
> Now label=1 is jumping to a place where I send 500, and if I dont
> jump the script continues with setting up a simple call.
>
> The problem is when I run this scenario Iget the 500 in all cases,
> not only in 1% of the cases. Looking again in the documentaiton I
> can only find examples where test and chance is used togheter. But
> it also says that "test and chance can be combined, i.e to have..."
> so I guess I should be able to use chance alone? If this is not
> possible, can I add a test that is always true?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> // Andreas
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Sipp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
