Hello Rafael,
I don't believe this problem is related to sipp itself. As far as I know, this
/// mechanism has been implemented in order to make sipp recognize messages
with different call-id's as part of a same dialog. But here, your server is
responsible for the call abortion.
I found this in the RFC 3515
A REFER request MAY be placed outside the scope of a dialog created
with an INVITE.
You may check if your server allows a REFER request being placed outside of a
sipp dialog like you did.
Regards,
Olivier Boulkroune
________________________________
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rafael Sarmiento
Envoyé : mardi 3 juillet 2007 15:57
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: [Sipp-users] Same scenario with different Call-Ids(AttendedTransfer)
BTW, I'm using the 2.0.1 sipp version, on Windows,...
On 7/3/07, Rafael Sarmiento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Olvier,
Thank you for your quick answer.
Server error log:
sipp: The following events occured:
2007-07-03 15:25:47: Continuing call on unexpected message for Call-ID '[EMAIL
PROTECTED]': while expecting '202' response, received 'SIP/2.0 481 Call Does
Not Exist
From: < sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;user=phone>;tag=471
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=471
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.20:5062 <http://192.168.10.20:5062/>
;branch=z9hG4bK-812-1-17
Call-ID: XKV4X0-pSo///[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 4 REFER
Content-Length: 0
User-Agent: HiPath 1000 V1.0 M5T SIP-UA SAFE/v3.6.6.10
' .
2007-07-03 15:26:47: Call-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED], receive timeout on message 18
without label to jump to (ontimeout attribute): aborting call.
P.S:: I also attach a Wireshark/Ethereal capture.
Rafael Sarmiento.
On 7/3/07, Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
Hello Rafael,
Could you provide us with the corresponding sipp logs ?
Regards,
Olivier Boulkroune
________________________________
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] De la part de Rafael
Sarmiento
Envoyé : lundi 2 juillet 2007 16:16
À : [email protected]
Objet : [Sipp-users] Same scenario with different Call-Ids (AttendedTransfer)
Hello,
I'm trying to simulate an "Attended Transfer Call", with 3 clients processes in
the same machine, in order to test a gateway.
I used the prefixes in front the "Call-Id" variable as the tutorial states, but
I still receive a "481 Call Does Not Exist" error message from the GW after it
sends the REFER message. I attach the scenario files used.
Can this be a problem of the CSeq sequence?
Regards,
Rafa.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
