On 1/3/08, Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why do you need an ontimeout attribute ? Can't you just put
>
> <label id="1" />
>  <recv request="BYE" optional="true" next="4"/>
>
>  <label id="2" />
>  <recv request="INFO" optional="false" timeout="10000" ontimeout="3" />
>

I can't do that because I want the timeout of 25s to be honored if no
BYE is received. My scenario must check the timing of the messages,
not only their
sequence.

> ?
>
> If this BYE can also be received after the INFO message, an optional="global" 
> element migh be used to make the BYE taken into account and jump to label 4.
>

If I put optional="global", does this mean that the BYE may be
received at any time
during the scenario ? I will try that and replace the timeout in the
BYE by a pause.

> Or do I miss something ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Olivier Boulkroune
>

Regards,
K.L.

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de K L
> Envoyé : mercredi 2 janvier 2008 17:23
> À : Charles P Wright
> Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
> Objet : Re: [Sipp-users] Strange behaviour on recv+optional+ontimeout
>
> On 1/2/08, Charles P Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > K L,
> >
> > If you jump to the end of the call SIPp marks it as failed automatically
> > (which I think is probably not the best possible behavior), but you can
> > easily get around it by doing something like:
>
> In my case, I don't jump to the end of the scenario:
>
> - If a BYE is received, I jump to the "next" label (4) to send a 200 OK.
> - If no BYE is received, I jump to the "ontimeout" label (2), to wait
> for another request (non-optional).
>
> So, in both cases, there is an action made, and I do not jump to the
> end of the scenario.
>
> >
> > <recv request="BYE" timeout="25000" ontimeout="2" next="4" />
> >
> > ...
> >
> > <label id="2" />
> > <!-- just so we have a scenario element after label 2 -->
> > <nop />
> > <!-- end of scenario -->
> >
> > Charles
> >
>
> Regards,
> K.L.
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/31/2007 09:51:39 AM:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In a (UAC) scenario, I have the following line, to allow the remote
> > > UA to send a
> > > BYE during the call (after the dialog is established):
> > >
> > > <recv request="BYE" optional="true" timeout="25000" ontimeout="2"
> > next="4" />
> > >
> > > Whether a BYE is received or not, I'd like the call to be considered
> > > as successful.
> > > If no BYE request is received from the remote UA, the call proceeds
> > normally.
> > > The problem is that the call is considered as failed by SIPp ("receive
> > > timeout on message 10, jumping to label 2").
> > >
> > > Since the recv is marked as "optional", it seems strange to me that SIPp
> > > considers the jump to label 2 as an error. Is there an option to change
> > this
> > > behaviour ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > K.L.
> > >
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sipp-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Sipp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to