SIPp's XML parser is unfortunately not an XML parser, so errors are not 
caught very well at all.

The timeout value should be fine.  What is the precise error message you 
see (please copy and paste).  Any extra spaces or things would mess up 
this value.

If you want help getting the scenario loaded you should post it if at all 
possible.

Charles




"Michael Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/21/2008 03:09 PM

To
"Srivastava, Anuj Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
<[email protected]>
cc

Subject
Re: [Sipp-users] 3.1 - scenarios don't work, no documentation,  not 
packaged properly






Hi,
Ok, done a bit more investigation and I?d like to share our progress with 
you and how we went about it ? because it was a bit arduous and hopefully 
someone will get some benefit from our experience even though we still 
can?t get it working with version 3.1.
 
When we loaded the scenario into a different XML editor we found a missing 
tag. However ? we also found a problem in the DTD which might explain why 
our original XML editor didn?t pick up our missing tag. 
 
The error in the DTD we get is at line 21:  <!ATTLIST exec command CDATA > 
 - we don?t know what this is about or whether it is serious or not, 
anyway we fixed the missing tag in our XML, but we were then back to where 
we were before (almost), with the scenario working in 3.0 but not in 3.1. 
 
When we ran it in 3.0 it created calls and it worked. In 3.1 we got an 
error, it complained about the label ?m? which we used to denote the 
master. 
 
The way we successfully debugged was to remove the block with ?m? in it. 
SIPP then complained about something in the block above it, we deleted 
this block and guess what ? it complained about the block above that. We 
did this iteratively until SIPP started successfully and then we examined 
the block we had just removed. We found a couple of extraneous bits in 
there, an assignment which was never used and a tretrans on a receive 
command which obviously wasn?t necessary.
 
During the debug process we found out that it didn?t like a timeout value 
of 1800000, having removed that it now works on v3.0 and performs very 
well ? still no joy with 3.1 though.
 
Question ? is there a limit on values for timeouts? We need a long timeout 
because we have queuing on our sip server.
 
Thanks,
Michael
 
 
 
From: Srivastava, Anuj Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:45 AM
To: Michael Lynch; [email protected]
Subject: RE: 3.1 - scenarios don't work, no documentation, not packaged 
properly
 
Hello Michael,
Due to the fact that many new features have been added in this release, 
and usage of few have changed from before,
it would be useful if you can mention what exactly is the problem faced by 
your team regarding 3pcc and other issues.
That would help to fix whatever issues are there.
 
Documentation is very much available under "current documentation", which 
you can refer.
http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html
 
Thanks
Anuj

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael 
Lynch
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sipp-users] 3.1 - scenarios don't work, no documentation, not 
packaged properly
 
My team and I have found the following problems with v3.1
 
1)      Our scenarios do not work properly (they worked fine in 3.0) ? 
(features we use are regexp, 3PCC)
2)      There is no documentation specific to this version - despite the 
long list of functionality additions on sourceforge, I can?t find the 
documentation for it
3)      The PCAP support is not packaged hence we have to compile it
 
I am very disappointed by this release, it seems to have bypassed quality 
control.
 
 
Michael Lynch 
 
 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files attached may contain 
confidential and proprietary information of Alcatel-Lucent and/or its 
affiliated entities. Access by the intended recipient only is authorized. 
Any liability arising from any party acting, or refraining from acting, on 
any information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. If you are 
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, destroy 
the original transmission and its attachments and do not disclose the 
contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the 
information in any medium. Copyright in this e-mail and any attachments 
belongs to Alcatel-Lucent and/or its affiliated entities. 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files attached may contain 
confidential and proprietary information of Alcatel-Lucent and/or its 
affiliated entities. Access by the intended recipient only is authorized. 
Any liability arising from any party acting, or refraining from acting, on 
any information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. If you are 
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, destroy 
the original transmission and its attachments and do not disclose the 
contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the 
information in any medium. Copyright in this e-mail and any attachments 
belongs to Alcatel-Lucent and/or its affiliated entities.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to