The usual problem with this is that <> are intercepted by the top level decoder
(which is not a true xml parser). This might have changed but the work-around
used to be to use -gt and -lt instead of > or <.
Peter> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:47:43 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Rexexp for "Route:
<>" ..> > On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 at 13:56, Venkat Narasimhan wrote:> > I ve been
trying to find the reg exp to locate the pattern "Route: <>" or simply the "<>"
pattern ...> > So regex="Route: <>" didn't work? According to my reading of
the> posix regex doc that should be the correct expression to match> that
string :)> > --RDM> >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------> This
SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge> Build
the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes> Grand
prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world>
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/>
_______________________________________________> Sipp-users mailing list>
[email protected]>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
_________________________________________________________________
See the most popular videos on the web
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/115454061/direct/01/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
