Well, so you just count the sent INVITEs (without retransmissions) and
the received ACKs. You can get this information quite easily by using
the -trace_shortmsg-function.

n(ACK)/n(INVITE w/o retrans) is the successrate ;)

br
Michael

On 2011-03-31 18:10, viswavardhanreddy karna wrote:
> Hi all,
>              i want to measure depending on the success-rate relevant.....
> 
> i will measure server performance by sending number of calls/second to
> server to load the server and by that i will be measuring the no:of
> successful calls....
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Michael Hirschbichler
> <s...@hirschbichler.biz <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz>> wrote:
> 
>     (Please do not forget to reply to the list too.)
> 
>     Well, what exactly do you want to measure?
> 
>     How do you define "performance"?
>      * Is the delay relevant (performance indicated by the speed of
>     processing the requests at high load)?
>      * Or is the success-rate relevant (performance indicated by how man
>     calls were set up successfully)?
>      * or is both relevant (a call must handled successfully within a
>     specific time interval)?
> 
>     Depending on your definition, you must decide, where and what you want
>     to observe.
> 
>     br
>     Michael
> 
> 
> 
>     On 2011-03-31 15:26, viswavardhanreddy karna wrote:
>     > Hi michael,
>     >                    Thanks again for replying....
>     >
>     > But when you see the only acks ... how many invites you send from
>     client
>     > that many acks can be received... so there will be no failure calls
>     > every call will be successsful.
>     >
>     > For calculating the server performance i am loading server with
>     > calls/sec of more than 500 or 600 in that case if every call becomes
>     > successful how can we know the server performances at acks....
>     >
>     >
>     > with regards,
>     > viswavardhan
>     >
>     > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Michael Hirschbichler
>     > <s...@hirschbichler.biz <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz>
>     <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     On 2011-03-31 14:41, viswavardhanreddy karna wrote:
>     >     > I am using SIPp as traffic generator... in order to
>     calculate the
>     >     number
>     >     > of successful calls from total number of calls which side
>     results
>     >     should
>     >     > be taken?
>     >
>     >     Well, the question is, how do you define a successful call?
>     And that's
>     >     the reason why I forwarded you to rfc6076, where some of these
>     metrics
>     >     are described.
>     >
>     >     E.g., you can calculate the "Successful Session Setup -
>     Session Request
>     >     Delay" - the delta between sending the 1st INVITE and
>     receiving the
>     >     first response initiated by the B-Party (mostly the 180 Ringing).
>     >     Another metric is the "Session Disconnect Delay", where you
>     calculate
>     >     the delay between sending the BYE and receiving the 200OK
>     >
>     >     Usually, a successful call is initiated, when the ACK arrived at
>     >     B-Party. So, log with the shortmessages-flag on both A- and
>     B-party and
>     >     calculate the "sent INVITEs"-"received ACKs" ratio
>     >
>     >     br
>     >     Michael
>     >
>     >     >
>     >     > what i mean is user agent client produces some results and
>     user agent
>     >     > server produces some results .. in these 2 results which results
>     >     should
>     >     > i consider as number of successfull calls?
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > can you please give me an idea regarding this...
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > with regards,
>     >     > viswavardhan
>     >     >
>     >     > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Michael Hirschbichler
>     >     > <s...@hirschbichler.biz <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz>
>     <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz>>
>     >     <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz>
>     <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz <mailto:s...@hirschbichler.biz>>>> wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >     I propose you take the KPIs from RFC 6076 - "Basic
>     Telephony SIP
>     >     >     End-to-End Performance Metrics",
>     >     >
>     >     >     br
>     >     >     Michael
>     >     >
>     >     >     On 2011-03-30 23:23, viswavardhanreddy karna wrote:
>     >     >     > Hi every one,
>     >     >     >                      I have a doubt regarding the
>     calculation of
>     >     >     server
>     >     >     > perforrmance.
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Should we take successfull calls that are obtained
>     from the
>     >     UAC side ?
>     >     >     > or successful calls obtained from the UAS SIDE..? for
>     >     evaluation of
>     >     >     > server performance...
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > thanking you soo much,
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > with regards,
>     >     >     > viswavardhan
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >
>     >    
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     >     > Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
>     >     >     > Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
>     >     >     > WebMatrix provides all the features you need to
>     develop and
>     >     >     > publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     >     > Sipp-users mailing list
>     >     >     > Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     >     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>     >     >     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     >     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>>
>     >     >     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >    
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     >     Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
>     >     >     Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
>     >     >     WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
>     >     >     publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
>     >     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     >     Sipp-users mailing list
>     >     >     Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     >     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>     >     >     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     >     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>>
>     >     >     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; 
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and 
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to