Hello,
here is my call flow
Party A SIPp Party B Party C
| | | |
| 1a INVITE | | |
|-------------------->| | |
| | 1b INVITE | |
| |--------------->| |
| | 1c 180 Ring. | |
| |<---------------| |
| 1d 180 Ringing | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| | | |
| | | | 2 Call
| | | | Pickup
| | | |
| | | |
| | |3a INVITE Call PU|
| |<---------------------------------|
| | | |
| 3b INVITE/Replaces | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| 3c 200 OK | | |
|-------------------->| | |
| | | 3d 200 OK |
| |--------------------------------->|
| 1e CANCEL/200 | | |
|-------------------->| | |
| | 1f CANCEL/200 | |
| |--------------->| |
| | 1g 487 Req Term| |
| |<---------------| |
| 1h 487 Req Term | | |
|<--------------------| | |
| 1i ACK | | |
|-------------------->| 1j ACK | |
| |--------------->| |
| | | 3e ACK |
| 3f ACK |<---------------------------------|
|<--------------------| | |
| | | |
|<======================= MEDIA ======================>|
We have already attempted this and we see the 3a INVITE being sent
through wireshark, but SIPp is not recognizing the 3a INVITE from Party C.
Is it possible for the slave instance of Party C to receive INVITE
messages from Party C?
--
Doug Beach
Telecore, Inc.
www.telecore.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
