Hi,
Takeshi, the command line used is
./sipp -r
10 -rp 1000 -l 1 -sf reg.xml -inf test.csv 192.168.25.186 -i 192.168.25.186
P.S.:
The SIP stack of my application is running on the same machine as sipp.
The
content of the csv and xml files is as follows:
test.csv
SEQUENTIAL
user2;
reg.xml
<?xml
version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<!DOCTYPE
scenario SYSTEM "sipp.dtd">
<scenario
name="branch_client">
<send retrans="500">
<![CDATA[
MESSAGE sip:[remote_ip] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/[transport]
[local_ip]:[local_port];branch=[branch]
Max-Forwards: 70
From: [field0]
<sip:[field0]@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;tag=[call_number]
To: [field0]
<sip:[field0]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]>
Call-ID:
[call_id]
CSeq:
1 MESSAGE
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 7
Expires:
300
Watson,
]]>
</send>
<recv
response="200">
</recv>
</scenario>
As
for the data injection from an external file, I didn’t realize I have already
been using it in my testing as shown above. However, it looks like the value in
the field cannot exceed 7 characters? In real world, SIMPLE IM message could be
a lot more than 7 chars and I was adding long texts in the test.csv for the
message content like “user2;abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz;”.
My monitoring on my own application showed that the string
“abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyx”
was truncated to “abcdefg”. Am I missing anything in
using the data injection?
Thanks!
Regards,
Alex
--- 11年11月29日，周二, mayamatakeshi <mayamatake...@gmail.com> 写道：
>发件人: mayamatakeshi <mayamatake...@gmail.com>
>主题: Re: [Sipp-users] SIMPLE IM load test
>收件人: "he yaxin" <crazyplayer1...@yahoo.com.cn>
>抄送: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>日期: 2011年11月29日,周二,上午1:54
>
>
>
>On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:58 AM, he yaxin <crazyplayer1...@yahoo.com.cn>
>wrote:
>Hi all,
>>I am trying to load test SIMPLE IM message on the SIP stack of my own
>>application. I have gone to a stage where sipp can fire SIMPLE IM messages to
>>my application and can get the 200 response successfully. However, when I
>>tried to increase the load by hitting the "+" key on the keyboard, nothing
>>happened. Although the displayed call rate did increase, the scenario screen
>>kept displaying there is “0/1 calls during 1.000 s period” and "Peak was 1
>>calls, after 0 s”. I was also monitoring the SIMPLE IM messages received on
>>my application, and it was the fact that the SIMPLE IM message load was not
>>increased. Any idea how was this happening? My understanding is that sipp
>>should be firing the message at a higher frequency if the “+" key was hit.
>>Anyone has a clue on this?
>Please show us the contents of your xml file and the command-line used to
>start sipp.
>
>>In the mean time, I also would like to randomize the message content in each
>>SIMPLE IM so that the simulation is closer to the real world. Any idea how I
>>can do that in the scenario xml or there are other ways to do it?
>It is possible to inject data from an external file and you can ask the
>selection to be done at
>random:http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html#Injecting+values+from+an+external+CSV+during+callsregards,Takeshi
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
