Hi Alberto, Thanks for taking the time to answer, your answer was spot on. I thought I must have read the manual completely by now but apparently I missed that little gem.
Many Thanks Paul On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Alberto Valente < alberto-r-vale...@telecom.pt> wrote: > Hi; > > > > I think the problem is related with the value used in the Call-ID header. > > > > Sipp documentation states regarding the Call-Id keyword: > > > > A call_id identifies a call and is generated by SIPp for each new call. *In > client mode, it is mandatory to use the value generated by SIPp in the > "Call-ID" header.* Otherwise, SIPp will not recognise the answer to the > message sent as being part of an existing call. > Note: [call_id] can be pre-pended with an arbitrary string using '///'. > Example: Call-ID: ABCDEFGHIJ///[call_id] - it will still be recognized by > SIPp as part of the same call. > > > > Best Regards; > > > > Alberto Valente > > [image: http://www.meo.pt] <http://www.meo.pt/>[image: PT] > <http://www.telecom.pt/> > > *Alberto Manuel Rolim Valente * > DEI/ECP/RPI > alberto.r.vale...@telecom.pt > [image: facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/meo>[image: twitter] > <http://www.twitter.com/meopt>[image: sapovideos] > <http://videos.sapo.pt/meo>[image: facebook] <http://www.youtube.com/meo> > > > > *From:* Paul Miller [mailto:idkpmil...@sip2serve.com] > *Sent:* terça-feira, 4 de Novembro de 2014 08:34 > *To:* sipp-users > *Subject:* [Sipp-users] Discarding message > > > > Hi, > > I have been over the scenario and the messages many times, I cannot see > what is wrong with the scenario, or the 1xx responses are not considered as > part of the call. I would appreciate someone casting their eyes over and > spotting the mistake. > > > > Thanks > > > > Paul >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
