On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:59 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:38 -0700, Kevin Thorley wrote: > > The plan for HA support (which is not implemented yet) is to > > automatically generate host-specific config (such as ip address) as part > > of the replication process. However, the understanding I came away with > > in the planning meeting was that there was no requirement for > > user-configured settings to be varied between hosts in an HA > > environment. Are you saying this is not correct? > > The facility for user-configured setting is to accommodate needs that > are not forseen at present. Hence, it would be hard to state now that > there will never bee a need to vary user-configured settings between > hosts. At the least, there are various config items relating to > interconnection between the components that vary between hosts, so I > would hardly be surprised to discover that new config items will vary > between hosts.
The decision was that since we don't need it now, we shouldn't add considerable complexity to the (already large) task of getting sipXconfig to take over writing the files. We did allow for those differences that are specifically due to addressing. > Now I don't know what planning meeting you are talking about, perhaps it > happened while I was fixing customers in Seattle, yes, it did. -- Scott Lawrence tel:+1.781.229.0533;ext=162 or sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sipXecs project coordinator - SIPfoundry http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipXecs CTO, Voice Solutions - Bluesocket Inc. http://www.bluesocket.com/ http://www.pingtel.com/ _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
