On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 05:59 -0400, Mcdaid, Paul (GAL:IE319) wrote: > > I'd say don't ask. We should pick which we prefer and do that without > > > asking. We can document how to change the decision later if it > > becomes an issue. > > Should we enable SELinux by default then and document how to disable it > (if required)? > > I think we should still ask the question, but specify the if unsure to > use the default choice.
I feel very strongly that we should not ask the question. Every configuration choice is a multiplier for our testing - a simple yes/no answer _doubles_ the testing burden. One could argue that we could only test the default answer, but I think that would be asking for trouble - if we're going to do that then we should just not ask. I don't see any reason why anyone would want to turn it off if sipXecs works with it on; since we will presumably have verified that everything works, there's no reason to turn it off. There is already documentation on how to control SElinux - at most we'll need to point to that, but I see no reason to worry about that now. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
