On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 16:08 -0400, Kevin Thorley wrote: > There is an issue in jira (http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XCF-2615) > that requests that we add an API call to sipXconfig to allow > sipXsupervisor to let sipXconfig know that a new distributed system has > come online and is ready to receive configuration. After discussing > this in the sprint planning meeting today, we decided it would be easier > to have sipXconfig poll the sipXsupervisor on the distributed system > (assuming that the distributed system has already been added in the > sipXconfig Server screen, which was agreed upon in the cluster config > meeting a couple months ago). Once sipXconfig is able to contact the > sipXsupervisor on the distributed system, it will push the > configuration. Does anyone object to this approach?
Other than a general objection to polling, I guess not. What frequency were you thinking of using? _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
