There is also an issue because we search /proc for a file/directory corresponding to the process-id in the start/stop process code path. This should be changed with the sipxsupervisor revisions. -ke
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 13:48 -0400, Martin Steinmann wrote: > If I recall correctly (Woof help me out), there are still a lot of > printf statements that somehow need to be changed because of a > difference in glibc. Would be very interesting to get this back on > track. > --martin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 8:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [sipX-dev] What Happened to Solaris Branch? > > Some time ago there was some effort to allow building of SipX on Solaris > 10. Has that been abondaned? I myself got a lot of SipX 3.8 (I think) to > work on Solaris 10, but never finished. > > Does anyone know what the status is? > > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
