On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:23 PM, M. Ranganathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> The p-asserted Identity patch is confusing freeswitch it seems and
> this is having a negative impact on interop testing. Moreover, it does
> not support the header in the way ITSPs want.
>
> What ITSPs want is - if the From header is [EMAIL PROTECTED], the
> p-asserted-identity header should contain the specific caller-id that
> they want to see (normally placed in the from header and present in
> the Dial plan). Otherwise, the signaling should not contain such a
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sorry -- correction here. The caller-id is in the gateway config (
not dial plan).
The outbound INIVITE can contain a PAI header if From header is not anonymous
but it will be the same as the From header and is hence redundant in this case.
> header. This is not what the p-asserted-id change currently does. May
> I suggest a revision of this feature to work as above.
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Ranga
>
> --
> M. Ranganathan
>
--
M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
