On Sep 19, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Andy Spitzer wrote: > Woof! > > Mardy, thanks for clarifying the current situation. I was confused > over all the versions of JAIN-SIP out there. This means the issues > I'm tracking down are probably not due to JAIN-SIP versioning > mismatches, as sipXpage is using the sipXcommons version at both > compile and run time. Good, now I can look elsewhere for my troubles.
I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the JVM is implicitly adding the RPM supplied jain-sip jar to the class path. Try running the JVM with the "-verbose" switch and see what/where it is loading packages. -Mardy _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
