The customer case we had reported had registration issues - the phone showed registered, but when the user attempted to make a call it did not get placed. This may have been related to multiple registrations.
I would not recommend that 601s are deployed with this method unless SIP 3.1.0 or later is being used. Marek -----Original Message----- From: Huijun Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 8:28 AM To: Paul Mossman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dutkiewicz, Marek Subject: RE: [sipX-dev] Another Polycom question: feature.x.name Marek wrote: > There have been some issues identified relating to feature enablement > when there is no valid license key. > > One of these (Issue 44509) was addressed in SIP 3.1.0. In that case, > certain configurations did not work properly as there was an issue > with reading in the license on an IP 601 phone. >Huijun: In your designer testing of XCF-2728 (Enable Polycom Productivity Suite), did you happen to test a 601? I did test it with 601 set, and did not notice problem with my settings.. I was told that to have feature enabled but with no valid license won't do any harm to the sets. Marek, can you be more specific on the issues? Thanks, Huijun _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
