Huijun Yang wrote: > >> And, if I understand this correctly, recent changes to authentication >> do not apply here at all: FROM address identity > is not that of the >> user, it's conference server and conference server does not have >> credentials. > > That is probably the reason, I did not know conference server does not > have credentials, so it was not considered as a "local user". But if > that is the case, it does not explain why the same conference server in > the case of calling external extension was challenged? >
Proxy challenges INVITE if target requires permission. If you invite a local user, no permission is required: hence no challenge. If you invite - as Joe did - a contact that triggers a long distance dial rule, the INVITE gets challenged. BTW: I looked at the code and I am not sure why it does not work (it's in TransactionApplicationData.response - see handling of Response.PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_REQUIRED, does not seem to be any different for INVITE and REFER). I'll open sipXconfig bug to capture this problem. D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
