> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Lawrence, Scott (BL60:9D30) > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 12:26 PM > To: Attardi, Joseph (BL60:9D30) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Help - sipXproxy dies and core dumps > > > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 12:07 -0400, Joseph Attardi wrote: > > Joseph Attardi wrote: > > > I didn't think that would cause it to crash, though. I am running > > > with the latest from SVN (13629). > > > > After some GDB help from Andrei, I was able to pinpoint where the > > crash was occurring. I've attached the stack trace to this > message. If > > anyone can help or offer any pointers, I'd be grateful. > > plain text document attachment (sipXproxy-crash-info.txt) Core was > > generated by `/usr/local/sipx/bin/sipXproxy'. > > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > > #0 TiXmlNode::FirstChild (this=0x0, _value=0x8064202 > "routes") at ../../../src/sipXportLib/src/xmlparser/tinyxml.cpp:338 > > 338 for ( node = firstChild; node; node = node->next ) > > (gdb) where > > This is what happens when the proxy is started without > forwardingrules.xml, which won't be allowed later today when > I get the new sipXsupervisor code checked in... >
Doesn't it point to a lack of robustness somewhere, though? We shouldn't segfault because of a missing file... _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
