On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 21:26 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Martin Steinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> So... what would be better? > >> > >> We want sipXconfig to generate all the configuration files, but how > >> should it get the addresses for each system and decide which one the > >> services should use? > >> > >> Should we just have the sipx-setup script ask and stick the answer > >> in a well known place for sipXconfig to read? > >> > >> Please don't say "let's just keep config.defs". > >> > > > > That is maybe too simple a suggestions, but why wouldbn't we just assume > > it is the address on eth0? I would hate to see more questions asked by > > a setup script. > > --martin > > For a non-HA system, one could query all available interfaces and > present the user with a choice.
> For a HA system, get the domain name (sans host name), do a DNS SRV > lookup of the domain, and from the returned set of host names, find > one that corresponds to an IP address bound to an interface on that > machine and use that one. That's a cart-before-the-horse solution: sipXconfig needs to generate those DNS records.... _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
