> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Worley, Dale (BL60:9D30)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: Krzeminski, Damian (BL60:9D30)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] alarm server in a cluster
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:02 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote:
> > Why can't all services report the alarms to a single
> instance of the
> > server. They can be easily configured that way, and it might make
> > alarm reporting and aggregating simpler.
>
> The usual reason to have multiple instances of an alarm
> service is so that if one instance goes down, there is
> another instance to report that it has done so.
>
> Dale
>
That isn't the case at all, here. The multiple alarm servers aren't for
redundancy, they are just part of the local supervisor and prevent
losing alarms if remote machines go down.
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
