On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 13:12 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 16:31 +0000, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 10:16 -0400, Kevin Thorley wrote: > > > > > Yes, but in the case of the UI layout you presented, any given page only > > > displays the groups that are installed and running on a given server, > > > correct? Are there any cases where more than one service of a type runs > > > on the same server? > > > > Before Dale explains that he does this all the time when testing.... > > > > Under production conditions we don't need to be able to run multiple > > instances of the same service on the same system (at least not for 4.0), > > so sipXconfig does not need to support it. > > I'd say it should be a requirement that sipXconfig doesn't fail if it > finds multiple instances, but it doesn't need to be able to manage them.
I can't think of any way that sipXconfig could 'find' multiple instances, because it does everything through sipXsupervisor, and sipXsupervisor has no provision for multiple instances. The only way you could run more than one of anything on the box is to hand-execute the command to start it, in which case sipXsupervisor won't know it exists. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
