On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 14:08 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 21:33 +0000, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > Martin take note - Dale is making all our messages significantly > > smaller ! > > Thinking about things further, unfortunately even if we append the > hostport to the Call-Id, we need to use a 64-bit random field, because > we can't depend on the hostport to be unique across the Internet -- an > awful lot of sipX's will have address 168.192.1.10, for instance.
Don't use the address - use the domain name. That will be much more likely to be unique. Anyone using a domain that isn't legit in the DNS or one ending in .local won't be able to do SIP over the Internet anyway, so they only need to worry about collisions within the domain and (I have it on good authority that) the smaller number of bits is fine for that. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
