Woof! On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:34:34 -0400, Robert Joly (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1- Inbound call from AT&T's Nokia-based gateway to a local sipXecs user > 2- INVITE is forked to phone which replies with 180 Ringing therefore > establishing an early dialog with the AT&T gateway > 3- The phone does not answer so sipXecs forks the call to voicemail > 4- voicemail replies with 180 Ringing followed by 200 OK which > establishes a second dialog with the AT&T gateway Before we do work to "fix" this flaw, lets open a ticket with AT&T/Nokia. Then instead of full b2bua mode, would it be easier to have sipxbridge supress all 1xx responses towards the provider? Then the gateway would only see the final responses from the answering fork (and in some race conditions final responses from secondary forks as well, but hopefully those'll be ignored). What would "break" if we didn't send 1xx's? --Woof! _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
