> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Robert Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Robert Joly
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> Attached is a trace for an INBOUND invite from the ITSP
> >> that is being
> >> >> routed to extension 203. I am getting an authentication
> challenge
> >> >> from the proxy and I dont know how to respond. This
> >> scenario used to
> >> >> work previously but is now broken. What is causing the
> >> INVITE to be
> >> >> challenged and what can I do to respond to this challenge?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Intriguing. Could you please provide sipXproxy debug logs
> >> for problem?
> >>
> >> Attached is a proxy debug log and the merged.xml for this scenario.
> >> Thanks in advance. Please let me know if a JIRA issue is needed.
> >> >
> >
> > The plugin that enforces auth rules seems to think that permissions
> > are required to get to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is part of
> > your local domain. Could you please attach your
> authrules.xml file to
> > so that we can investigate further?
> >
> >
> I have attached both authrules.xml.in and authrules.xml
>
>
The dialplan rule with description '944 01217140164' is misconfigured.
It catches any user (".") whose domain matches the local domain and
requires 'long distance' permissions hence the challenge. You should
take a second look at this rule and make it less encompassing, e.g. use
more restricitve user match conditions by imposing certain prefixes or
length.
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
