> > >On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:35 -0500, Dale Worley wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:05 -0500, Raymond Dans wrote: >> > I'd like to at least double this current limit (i.e. to 12,000,000 >> > bytes) in order to be able to support these larger requests. Is there >> > any objection to this or will this open us up to abuse? >> >> This sounds like a good idea for dealing with the present problem, but >> this seems to be a sign that we need a better method for replicating >> tables than putting the entire contents into one XMLRPC. > >Agreed. > >I think that doing partial updates is becoming urgent. >
+1 I am not fond of limits that make this blow up again in unexpected circumstances --martin _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
