> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spitzer, Andy (BL60:9D30) 
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:35 AM
> To: Beeton, Carolyn (CAR:9D60); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] consequences of supervisor crash
> 
> Woof!
> 
> 
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:36:32 -0500, Carolyn Beeton 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > The   main consequence of a crash in the supervisor is that 
> the child
> > processes are stranded with no parent and no way of 
> shutting them down.
> > 
> 
> One way to prevent this is have the "child" processes detect 
> that STDIN closed, and when that happens they commit suicide. 
>  As stdin is inherited from the parent as a pipe, it closes 
> when the parent process closes it (which it would never do, 
> normally), or when the parent dies.  Orphans cause nothing 
> but trouble in our society, and would be best served to kill 
> themselves!  (What a great quote to get me in trouble when 
> taken out of context!)
> 
> 
> --Woof!
> 
This sounds like a good idea too.  Without the supervisor, no
xmlrpc-based communication will work, so having the processes continue
to limp along is probably not good.  Better to shut down altogether;
someone is bound to notice that! 
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to