I don't know if my previous response got sent... On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:10 -0500, Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30) wrote: > I think that the problem you raise has already been addressed in the > current NAT traversal design. [...]
I'll have to re-read those sections of the design. > BTW, I noticed that this document and other NAT-related docs only exist > in the merge-proxy branch. Is that intentional? Certainly not. Ugh, the tool I use to compare two branches was configured to ignore 'doc' directories. I'll fix all that... Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
