On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 11:33 -0600, voice wrote: > Hi > > I will install into test Centos5 box. 3.11.x from svn and install on a dual > nic box. > > By default > eth0 is public(56.19.x.x) and > eth1 is private (192.168.10.2) == sipX. gateway 192.168.10.1 netmask > 255.255.0.0
This configuration is not recommended. See http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Redundant_network_interfaces > hostname of box is sipx.ssss.net, which is public DNS domain and associated > to eth0. > > 1. How does sipX distinguish between the 2 NIC's at intallation time? The current setup scripts will use only eth0. Putting SIP devices on the other network may or may not work at all (this depends in part on the other SIP devices and how you have routing configured on that network). > 2. After downloading from sipX and creating SSL does sipX default to > hostname of box, which is a public domain. Does this make sense when sipX > is running in the boxes private space. OR should sipX not be installed on > dual NIC box and use only 1 NIC with public address. > > 3. Does sipX need to have the DHCP server running to function when in fact > all registration well be remote registration. On this box no local nodes. Some diagnostics may complain if there is no DHCP, but it should work as long as the phones are happy. > 4. When installing sipX using svn what is the relationship between eth0 and > sipX domain name used when configuring sipX > > Does 3.11.x still need the config.defs to function? It won't when it's done... not quite there yet, I believe _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
