On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:08 -0500, Dale Worley wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 17:18 -0500, M. Ranganathan wrote: > > In setting up some Unit tests for sipxbridge, I am wondering how to > > interpret an OK to a Register returned from the ITSP without the > > specified Contact header that was used in the REGISTER request. Is > > this indicative of the failure of the REGISTER attempt ( that is my > > working assumption ). > > I can't think of any other interpretation. Technically it's an error > (as the registrar is simultaneously telling you that your registration > succeeded but that your contact is not currently registered). Actually, > I'd log it specifically as an error (so the user will attend to it) and > treat it operationally as a failed registration.
It's just a bug in the Registrar. I agree that it should be logged as such, but I see no reasonable way to deal with it. Is this something you've seen for real, or are you just working through the cases in building tests? If the latter, I wouldn't even test for it. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
