On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Scott Lawrence
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 12:32 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Following some discussions on #sipx, I thought I should broadcast this
>> to a wider audience (especially those testing our system):
>>
>> - If you configure a bad stun server, configtest will fail.
>> - If you restart the system with a failed stun server, restart will
>> fail (on configtest).
>> - sipxrelay and sipxbridge will send out an alarm if the stun server
>> is detected as being down during operation and another alarm when the
>> stun server comes back up again ( this behavior is yet to be
>> implemented ).
>
> I don't think that configtest should fail - that prevents the service
> from starting.  It would be better if the service started and fired the
> alarm then kept retrying until the stun server became accessible again.

Without the public address, the service is useless. I  need  the
public address for call setup from sipxrelay and for sipxbridge I need
it for Contact address, I cannot do any registration or call setup.

What does "started" mean if it cannot initialize?  It can do nothing
sensible so there is no point in starting.

>
>> Perhaps some day we can run our own high availability stun server ( or
>> set of stun servers ).
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ranga
>>
>
>



-- 
M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to