> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sipx-dev- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Lawrence > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 5:58 PM > To: Robert Joly > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] XCF-3139 Proposal > > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 15:01 -0400, Robert Joly wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Regarding XCF-3139 (Cannot add or delete Intranet Subnets on > > > the Internet Calling GUI Page) After a discussion took on IRC > > > we agreed upon the following changes: > > > > > > 1.Create a new page with topology/subnets - will allow > > > creation of multiple sets of topology/subnets 2.All sets will > > > be generated in nattraversalrules.xml we will have something like: > > > <localtopology> > > > <ipV4subnet>10.0.0.0/8</ipV4subnet> > > > <ipV4subnet>172.16.0.0/12</ipV4subnet> > > > <ipV4subnet>192.168.0.0/16</ipV4subnet> > > > <dnsWildcard>*.d1.itcnetworks.ro</dnsWildcard> > > > </localtopology> > > > <localtopology> > > > <ipV4subnet>11.0.0.0/8</ipV4subnet> > > > <ipV4subnet>173.16.0.0/12</ipV4subnet> > > > <ipV4subnet>194.168.0.0/16</ipV4subnet> > > > <dnsWildcard>*.d2.itcnetworks.ro</dnsWildcard> > > > </localtopology> > > > 3.Internet Calling page will be changed - such as: depending > > > on what sbc is selected will pick a topology/subnet set (from > > > a drop-down probably) 4.For now we will keep NatTraversal Tab > > > - we may find a better solution by the end of this sprint if > > > time permits > > > > > > Please share your opinions. > > > > A few comments: > > 1- I like the idea of separating the topology information from > internet > > calling & NAT traversal. > > 2- One could make the argument that the 'server behind NAT' > information > > element relates to topology. A UI-savvy person (that excludes me!) > > should consider whether or not that setting should be moved to your > new > > topology page. > > 3- What is the motivation for providing multiple topology sets. If > we > > cannot think of a compelling use case then my vote is to stick a > single > > set for simplicity sake. > > There are lots of companies out there that have multiple subnets - ours > included, but even small ones often do.
Almost every system we setup has multiple subnets... largely because we use one VLan for the phone system and another for the data network. Softphones on PC's of course live on the data network as does the firewall most of the time. PBX, hard-phones and gateways on the phone VLan. Mike > > > 4- Both NAT traversal and Internet calling should have quick links to > > that new topology page. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
