> > I'm trying to understand the current method used to send a > register request. > > What I think i'd like to see long term is a 2nd ip address > bound simply to the remote register function, and see the > register requests forward to that (private) ip and allow the > traffic between trunking and remote users become better > segregated at some point in the future. I would think that > the second address scheme would also lend itself to being > able to blend it into HA more easily. > > Does this make sense to anyone else?
Let me play it back to test my understanding... You would like for sipXecs to have two private IP addresses - one to be used by users and the other to be used by ITSPs, right? If that is the case, could you expand on the value that this arrangement will bring? _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
