On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 17:05 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > Hello, > > Following up a discussion with Scott on #sipx, here is a trace where I > am attempting the following scenario : > > incoming call from ITSP phone 201 rings > Call pickup by Extension 202 > Attempt to blind transfer to Extension 203. > > The INVITE on the blind transfer gets a challenge (407) response (note > Frame 114 )
What is the SIP domain and realm of this system? I see that the REFER has "Refer-To: <sip:[email protected]?x-sipx-authidentity=%3csip%3auser2% 40example.local%3Bsignature%3D49D676F5%253A% 253A746fa93df32a1de66fe4e0d87692f7eb%3E>". The blind transfer target is "sip:[email protected]" but the authorization identity is "sip:[email protected]". That suggests the realm is not the same as the domain. That's OK, but we have to make sure that the generation and detection of authidentities agrees on how to construct them. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
