>>> "Mark Gertsvolf" <[email protected]> 04/06/09 12:27 PM >>> Scott Lawrence wrote: > As I've said before, an ITSP that can't cope with a different > port number is one that you'll have other problems with - get > a better one - the good ones have no trouble at all with > configuring a port other that 5060. >
Tony, While I agree that there is a general issue with non-standard ports, the following information may help work around your particular issue with bandwidth.com. According to bandwidth.com technical experts non-standard SIP port option is supported via manual provisioning. Customers can call in and request SIP port change. Cheers, Mark. Sure, am aware of that and I let Ranga know that. Just trying to make sure the knowledge is out there. We have a provisioning account with them and can do our own at schedule, though other ITSP's are not as forgiving, and it would be nice to keep the sipxecs proxy ports from having to change and entering into a non-standard configuration. Just thinking on how to make it easier to administer. - Thanks. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
