On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 13:55 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote:
> I would think that that the best way of guiding people through non-HA to HA > transition is to let them add a redundant server and only then tell them > that DNS might be wrong (if it indeed is wrong). If we never let them to > add the second server we will never have a chance of display a correct DNS > configuration for it (DNS advisor works when the remote location is already > added). > > Also SIP domain name (which by the way can have nothing to do with your > host names) does not have to be something that you change lightly - this > might be something that you shared with the world already. > You might want the option to keep whatever name you selected (even if it > turned out to be less than optimal choice) and still use HA. > > As of now I see more arguments against implementing such restrictions than > for it. And since this is new feature we did not really have a real user > feedback on it. > > I'll allow to keep this issue open: if I see people getting into trouble > because of it, I'll take a patch. Ok, but let's actually have someone do a test in QA and see if the phones get this right; if our most important phones do, then we can safely leave it as is. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
