On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 11:00 -0400, Kathleen Eccles wrote: > I changed the code to pass this test by removing hard limits (180s) in > the INVITE transaction path. I did not extend the timing for all > transactions. It seems to me that we would not want other transactions > to have unlimited time outs.
Seems good to me. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
