On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 17:06 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote:
> I am trying to start discussion on sipXconfig changes post 4.0 release.
> 
> There are some technical questions that would be good to tackle here:
> 
> - do we need to use new or update current libraries for REST (we use
> RESTlet at the moment, is there anything we need to evaluate out there?)
> - what client technology makes sense - I am partial to direct or generated
> javascript since this is what browsers are running natively, is there
> anything else we should look at?

For the sake of argument I'll throw Flash and Silverlight/Moonlight out
there.  However, my vote is for javascript.

> - if it is javascript - what library if any? GWT, pyjs, scriptaculous
> /dojo, jquery - others? I'd like to use a library that let's me to write
> application and not something that is used to sprinkle some Ajax magic on
> static HTML.

ext (http://extjs.com/) recently released part of their framework under
an MIT license, which, if it contains the elements we need, would work
better for us than their other (GPL/commercial dual license) scheme.

> We should probably do what we did when selecting Tapestry: choose 2-3
> contenders, write an example page and compare experience.

Agreed.  When do we start? :)




_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to