On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Robert Joly <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am wondering if sipxbridge should proxy requests for which >> it does not manage the domain ( i.e. no ITSP account for the >> domain can be found ) rather than return 404 (not found) the >> way it does now. Will this solve the issue with specifying >> sipxbridge as the SBC for internet calling? > > If we are calling sipXbridge an SBC then I think it makes sense to allow > the admin to specify it as the SBC to use in any management page that > accepts an SBC. Implementing the change you propose would make that > possible and therefore I think it is a good idea. > The enhancement for sipxbridge is actually really easy to do. All I need to do is instead of returning NOT FOUND, I will return a dummy account with the domain equal to the domain that is being matched in the account database. The password field will be null and it will use public addressing for call setup. Naturally, this will not have credentials to handle a challenge from the target domain. I assume that is not a requirement in this case.
I will make the fix on the main branch (will take me just 10 minutes to do) and perhaps it can be considered for 4.0 itself if found satisfactory and the sipxbridge SBC option can be added back to the internet calling SBCs (?). I do think it is important to have this capability for internet calling. Ranga -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
