On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 10:55 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > Scott Lawrence wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 09:59 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > >> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-5396 > >> > >> We now have a patches that trigger upgrades through XML/RPC > >> But Bogdan reports that XML/RPC for upgrades does not work reliably. > >> > >> Can anyone help testing this? > > > > Have you got a binary setuid wrapper for the 'yum update -y' command? > > That command can only be run as root, and sipXsupervisor is running as > > SIPXPBXUSER. > > Paraphrasing a sipXecs coordinator let me ask "what do you mean by you?" ;-) > > Unless I misunderstood something sipXconfig user does not really matter > here: sipXconfig calls XML/RPC method and sipx-supervisor that implement > the method needs to be able to run those scripts.
Fair... Does sipXsupervisor execute the 'yum update -y' command _as_root_ by running some binary setuid program? If not, it's not going to work. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
