In trying to help the configuration folks put some better requirements into XX-5567 I think we need to change the output of DNS advisor. In the following example it is indicated that NAPTR and SRV records are required. In reality I don't believe this to be true in all cases. 1. HA Systems require SRV 2. NAPTR isn't required at all currently. I have tested this quite a bit but would love to know where this required?
If the above are true I was thinking a JIRA to modify the output of the script slightly would help. Something to indicate the above in the comments. Something like: ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Call Routing for SIP domain 'X.lab.local' ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Optional - NAPTR record for SIP TCP X.lab.local ; priority: 2 weight: 0 ; protocol: "SIP+D2T" regex: "" uri: _sip._tcp.X.lab.local ; X.lab.local. IN NAPTR 2 0 "s" "SIP+D2T" "" _sip._tcp.X.lab.local. ; Optional - NAPTR record for SIP UDP X.lab.local ; priority: 2 weight: 0 ; protocol: "SIP+D2U" regex: "" uri: _sip._udp.scs3.lab.local ; X.lab.local. IN NAPTR 2 0 "s" "SIP+D2U" "" _sip._udp.X.lab.local. ; Required HA - SRV record for domain SIP TCP X.lab.local ; priority: 1 weight: 0 port: 5060 server: X.lab.local ; _sip._tcp.X.lab.local. IN SRV 1 0 5060 X.lab.local. ; Required HA - SRV record for domain SIP UDP X.lab.local ; priority: 1 weight: 0 port: 5060 server: X.lab.local ; _sip._udp.X.lab.local. IN SRV 1 0 5060 X.lab.local. ; Required HA - SRV record for service SIP TCP rr.X.lab.local ; priority: 1 weight: 0 port: 5070 server: X.lab.local ; _sip._tcp.rr.X.lab.local. IN SRV 1 0 5070 X.lab.local. Comments? _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
