On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 16:30 -0400, Dale Worley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 15:58 -0400, keccles wrote:
> > I don't agree.
> > 
> > Without compiling for transaction debug, it's not completely clear,
> > but I think the timeout actually occurs on the branch 
> > z9hG4bK-sipXecs-005d18d17fae0a8fc21a92020a7ec9900e27
> > 
> > When this branch times out, it should roll to the UDP value returned
> > by SipSrvLookup::servers.
> > 
> > The 408 seen at sipXproxy.log::8878 is the final response on the
> > branch Dale mentions but it is _not_ the branch that actually timed
> > out.
> 
> Ugh, yes, the 408 we see is the end of the *destination* transaction of
> the messages on the branch I described, which is the transaction which
> is the *source* of the branch
> z9hG4bK-sipXecs-005d18d17fae0a8fc21a92020a7ec9900e27.
> 
> It doesn't roll over to UDP because the sending is controlled by this
> header:  X-Sipx-Nat-Route: 65.247.227.196:2878;transport=TCP  But if an
> attempt to send via TCP fails, it's supposed to attempt to resend via
> TCP about 4 times.  That's gross, but it ensures that if the current TCP
> connection has been terminated at the far end, it will be cleared away
> and a new TCP connection created.
> 
> But the whole process is over in about 70 msec, which is much faster
> than the send timeout values (100 msec +).  As far as I can tell, the
> stack isn't attempting to resend at all.
> 

Trying to figure out exactly where the timer is started is
non-trivial...  I think the timer really does last 100msec.

For some reason, in the most downstream transactions-  
when the tcp branch times out, SipTransaction::findTransactionFor fails to find 
a matching transaction.
Then the udp branch times out almost immediately, it finds a transaction, but 
its state is TRANSACTION_COMPLETE.

not yet sure why these things happened.

after that, the upstream branch (which got the 408 final response) properly 
rolls over to voicemail.

-Kathy

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to