On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 10:01 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote: > The > presence or absence of the port number should not be a problem (the > comparison function adjusts for that).
I'm starting to remember that, that at least in some circumstances, the test for URI equality will accept port number 5060 as equivalent to a missing port number in situations where RFC 3261 would say that they are not. But perhaps that process is not doing what we think it does? Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
