On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 14:54 -0400, M. Ranganathan wrote: > Hello all! > > There was a thread some time ago about relay free sipxbridge operation > and recently there has been a thread on sipx federation. I wonder what > you feel about the following. > > Say you wanted to tie system A and System B together. System A is the > "server" in this case and is providing NAT compensation to its remote > workers. System B can be configured using sipxbridge to look like a > remote worker to system A. > > Clearly we don't need two media relays between the systems. If we can > support an option to suppress relaying of media, then system B looks > like a remote worker to system A. > > When a request originates from System B bound for system A via > sipxbridge, its contact and Via would get re-written but sipxbridge > would leave the SDP alone. > sipxbridge on system B can forward REFER after appropriate re-writing > of the request as it is aware that is talking to another sipx system > that is capable of handling that REFER. > > It seems to me that this should be relatively easy to support in > sipxbridge. Will this scheme work in principle, as a possible solution > for federating systems? If not, what is wrong with this?
Sorry - I don't understand either what configuration you're describing or what problem you're trying to solve. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
